• superkret@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Designed to complement your operating system, whether on Windows 11, MacOS, or Linux.”

    Who the FUCK uses Edge on Linux??

    • aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Used it for a while. One very nice feature is that when you use multiple profiles, you can specify in which of those external links open in. Every other browser opens them in the window that last had focus so I regularly have work related links open up in the private profile.

      Also the performance was quite nice.

      But since they continuously rub new services in my face with new versions, I ditched it again.

      • people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mozilla’s “Multi-Account Containers” extension on Firefox does a much better job at the multiple profiles feature you’ve described.

        • aksdb@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I miss the tab grouping from Chrome based browsers in Firefox.

          And I think tab containers don’t provide the separation I need to properly separate work from private.

          • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You might be better off using a custom Firefox profile for that then. Not too well integrated UI-wise sadly though

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can do that in Chrome too, if you have multiple chrome profiles right clicking on links give you the option to open it in a different profiles window

        • aksdb@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but with “external” I meant opening links from other apps like Slack.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah that’s what I mainly used it for. I would right click links on slack and make sure it would open on my work profile or not depending on the context of the link.

            Although this could potentially have been when I used the web app rather than the installed app, so i may be misremembering

            • aksdb@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the WebApp this would work. Across apps it’s a different story, since they just invoke a system command to open the URL in the associated application. From there it’s in the hands of that application, how to deal with it.

    • loutr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just installed Edge on Arch after a disastrous Teams call with Firefox and Chromium, figured it was worth trying MS’ browser next time but I’m not holding my breath.

      • TheActualDevil@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Edge is just Chromium. When they retired IE they switched. It might still work better because it’s the default supposedly built to work with their products so their tweaks should help. But it is Teams and they’ve been doing a lot more updates lately. Did you update to the new version of Teams they’ve been pushing? It’s bad and it’s performance is bad, so that can cause issues.

      • meiti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Use different user accounts. That provides you with very stronger isolation and separation of concerns, with the bonus that you won’t be exposed to their crap.

    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only thing I can think of is if you are developing a website or extension and need to make sure there isn’t some subtle browser difference. Though since it uses the same engine as Chrome, that use case should be a lot more niche than it used to be.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Heh reminds me when I was doing web development back in the day and had IE running on Linux. It actually made more sense to test compatibility with IE by running it through wine on Linux than actually doing it on Windows because I could have multiple versions of IE installed at the same time.

    • robotrash@lemmy.robotra.sh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Much to the chagrin of a large portion of lemmy users Edge is not actually a bad browser. If you’re using a chromium based browser anyway there’s really nothing worse about edge than the other options. Obviously not talking about Firefox here.

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I chose edge over chrome nowadays. But I’m still a firefox man. The AI help chat thingemejig of edge is also pretty okay.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. It’s my Chrome browser of choice. I use Firefox virtually all the time, but if I need somethiung that works in the cases where non-chromium does not, I use Edge. It’s a fast, its already installed so no extra fuss, it has the best vertical tab implementation that really should be standard for every single browser.

        • sock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          im in the same boat edge is pretty fire tho imo compared to chrome at least.

          i havent used it in a bit tho coz of firefox but its a fine browser firefox being good doesn’t make edge bad

    • Whisp@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You get free credits for Dall-e for using edge (or maybe you just need to be signed into a msoft account 🤔)

      Also the bing AI chat is pretty good.

      Not my daily browser, but those are two reasons.

    • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It got way better in the past few years. I think everybody hates it, because the internet explorer was that slow. So it just stayed in our minds that the Microsoft browser sucked.

    • Granixo@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Edge is really the best browser for Windows users with low end PCs.

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        pretty much because like IE, when using Windows part of it runs in the background whether you like it or not.

    • tidaL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The experience in the enterprise as well as the management of it make sense for any company who are a m365 shop. Native seamless single sign on with corporate identities, along with syncing the browser make it a no brained for me to use for work. For personal stuff though I stick with Firefox.

    • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Got stuff at work (Microsoft services, for the record) that’ll work in Edge or Chrome, but not entirely in Firefox (gee, wonder why)

    • FireWire400@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mainly use Firefox but have Edge to test website with, can’t really uninstall it anyway.

      • papalonian@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean you can like or dislike it of course but are you really complaining about a viewport 20 square pixels smaller than normal

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, that’s what redditor/lemmy users do. None of these people know anything about UX design or the tens of millions of dollars companies pour into user research.

          Any minimally decent website already has margin along the viewport edge, at worst you’re shaving off a few pixels from an image that the user probably hasn’t finished scrolling to anyway. There’s no real loss in content with this change.

          • Tanza@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            apart from that it ruins any website’s unique design by forcefully shoving it’s rounded corners into it, or making anything in the corner look odd

    • FireWire400@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not really a new thing but it’s something that there’s seemingly no real reason for other than it looked good to whoever came up with it?

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Rounded corners make sense for phones (cause they provide better protection against falls), but I’ll never understand why they would do this to a desktop browser.

        • FireWire400@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          better protection against falls

          Do they really? I don’t know about other phones but on my Pixel 6 Pro the entire front is pretty much covered with glass so it doesn’t really matter if the OLED has a rounded bezel in front of it or not.

          It might protect the actual OLED in case of a drop, though.

          • 3laws@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Structurally speaking, yes rounded corners are 2 magnitudes better against direct impacts. That’s just physics.

      • 3laws@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        other than it looked good to whoever came up with it?

        That’s just objectively wrong. Biologically speaking.

        We have pretty much since we are Sapiens preferred rounded everything. Boba and Kiki are a thing.

        The oddity (biologically speaking) is finding sharp edges more appealing whee they offer no considerable advantage…

        When browsing even the least reactive webpage EVER; you won’t be needing those 32.5 missing pixels.

        • optissima@possumpat.io
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When browsing even the least reactive webpage EVER; you won’t be needing those 32.5 missing pixels.

          You think this is acceptable, until an ad put it’s close button up there and Chrome has already prevented AdBlock.

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Big companies don’t make highly visible design decisions like this on a whim… at least most of the time. They probably have research showing that rounded edges are preferred by end users. Maybe less anxiety inducing or something.

    • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not that new. Apple was doing it in the 1980s. Jobs made the engineers figure out a way to do it, enough though it used extra memory, when they didn’t have much to spare.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hell, they were doing it way back in the 1930s. TVs had rounded corners all the way into the 90s due to limitations of CRT design. I didn’t start seeing TVs with hard corners until the early 2000s. They didn’t last very long, cause a couple of years later Plasmas and LCDs became a lot more affordable and killed off the CRT market.

  • Pechente@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    The real mildlyinfuriating part is that they probably got inspired by Arc, a relatively new browser. They already copied how their window splitting works.

    Pretty crappy for MS not to have good designers themselves and then copy (often poorly) what one of the small players is doing.

    • rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rounded edges have been a trend in UX design for a while now. It’s not really a concept that they need to have stolen from anyone else.

  • br3d@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As it’s Microsoft, you can be pretty sure the option to turn off the new look and feel will be removed in 6 months

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      When you close a tab everything shrinks to a tiny square and then blinks out of existence.

      If you hold a magnet too close to edge it goes all weird.

    • Pyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      “This website looks best on Microsoft Edge at a resolution of 800x600”

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re joking, but that’s how I unintentionally use the web with Arc Browser. It has rounded corners and an adjustable sidebar of tabs on the right. The resulting viewport is tightly 4:3. Iirc, Edge can also have tabs on the side.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will write an unpopular statement:

    I use Microsoft edge even on Linux because it’s the only browser that has an option to save temporary downloads in /tmp instead of littering /downloads with unwanted trash. I open 100s of PDFs every day and the behavior of every browser to save in downloads without my consent is infuriating. Firefox allowed this but then they really had to copy the behavior of Google chrome. Reverting to the old behavior requires too many hacks, it’s easier to uninstall and use Edge

    • steersman2484@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      But you can just change the default download location to /tmp on firefox. Or you can choose ask me every time and set /tmp as your favorites, than you can reach it with a single click.

      I don’t know if this fits your use case

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        But it’s still a workaround, I have to save it and waiting for the save dialog to appear

        It’s much easier to just have two buttons, “open” (save in tmp and open) and “save”

        On windows, temp doesn’t get cleaned automatically at boot, but edge takes care of that and deletes the file when you close it

        • 3laws@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The ability to pick a temp folder to store your downloads is a feature, not a workaround, and every browser has it since forever™.

          There’s absolutely no way in Elon Musk’s xHell or Linus Torvalds kmodHeaven that you choose Edge just because it saves you 2.7s every time you download pepelore compilations in 4k HDR AV1.

          • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            My use case is this: opening invoices from the ERM. The web app sends it as a download. I open one every 2 minutes. On edge I have an “open” button that does what it says. On chrome/Firefox/opera/Vivaldi it just downloads and at the end of the month I have the download folder littered with thousands of useless files. Or I need to set it for opening to a dialog for a path that might be preset to a temporary directory (that on windows still must be manually cleaned). The time saving in my use case is a lot and this setting is synced to all my machines, where the temp directory workaround is not and I have to set to each single machine

            • no surprises@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re on Linux, create a simple bash script that would execute cd ~/Downloads && rm *.pdf and schedule it with cron. You spent more time writing these comments about the problem than solving it. I mean, of course, it’s up to you: you can talk about issues that you’re facing and use Edge if it satisfies you. I just find it a bit unusual, given that people often move to Linux because they don’t want to use Microsoft products.

              Edit: lemmy can’t deal with ampersands in the inline code block and I can’t deal with lemmy :D

              • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes but it’s an hassle that can be avoided. The reason I stopped using chrome in 2008 was exactly this style of download. If Firefox has the same behavior of Chrome, then I don’t like it anymore

              • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I have ten devices, I need to set this workaround on each of them. On edge the clearly labeled setting is automatically synced everywhere

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was explaining to someone in another thread that the only browser that works with the site I have to use for work is Chrome. I can’t help it if the Indian contractors made it Chrome-only somehow. I can’t use any other browser. Sometimes you’re stuck with the shitty option.

      • 3laws@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Contractually they can’t fire you for refusing to give up your human rights. Yes, privacy is a human right.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, okay, you get me a lawyer that will do that case pro-bono. I’m sure going to need it to be pro-bono since I won’t have a job.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              How about you do that first and we’ll cross the next bridge when we come to it. Good luck. I’m counting on you.

    • Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So your take is no one can have an opinion on anything. Got it

      • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s infuriating about fucking rounded corners on a webpage? Mildly or otherwise.

        Y’all need to learn some coping skills. Jesus.

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s infuriating is the decision to do it, or that it even crossed someone’s mind, or that people like you just defend whatever bullshit gets fed to you

          • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah dude let’s BURN THIS SHIT DOWN

            NO MORE ROUNDED CORNERS IN EDGE GOD DAMNIT THINK OF THE CHILDREN

            Later chump