• historypresent@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve often thought that it is odd that anyone can be frustrated about the race of Disney characters and actors. Like most of Disney’s stories are just tales passed across cultures through time. They are literally made up stories and the point is that the story changes as time and culture changes

    • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you mean what I think you mean, then you’re being down voted because your phrasing isn’t clear. I interpreted your comment to mean that removal any of dark skinned characters would often make the depiction less historically accurate, due to their historical presence as a minority of some sort across much of medieval Europe. If so, I agree that is amusingly ironic.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m saying that depicting black people as a normal feature of Medieval Europe would be huge stretch. Whether that should stop people from doing so, I don’t really care about that. Accuracy isn’t exactly the only thing to consider in such situations.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If you’re passing them off as just regular people nbd in that setting then yeah that’d be inaccurate.

        Then again, plopping in random white people into an Ancient Chinese setting would be pretty inaccurate too, even though there might’ve been “some non zero number” of whites over there at the time. Or in a random crowd shot of Nazi soldiers you plop in a few black soldiers. Certainly existed, but while funny it does make it seem inaccurate (and silly imo).

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s all about diversity in my Nazi soldier representation. The Asian woman was top tier decision from Gemini

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ancient China did have a lot of Central Asian and Turkic white people. Red hair, blue eyes and all. They just weren’t European whites.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think the implication of European whites was clear from the comment though

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        “Most historical settings”

        Roman sure, especially as you get closer to Africa but nonzero elsewhere also

        Middle ages, mediæval and renaissance almost certainly limited to higher nobility households either as nobles or “interesting” servants or major trading ports, especially closer to Africa.

        The chances of a mediæval serf in a germanic country not looking northern Europe, or Mediterranean at a huge stretch, are functionally zero though, as anyone who came with the Romans will have been long dead with their genetics widely dispersed, and anyone who came over recently would likely be in an urban area, with marriage or higher level employment being their only chance to end up in a rural area.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    No, you dont understand. All the historical records of that period I’ve seen dont have black people doing things.

    What do you mean fantasy movies from the 80s aren’t historical records?

  • VeryImportantUser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    There was a lot of black people in medevial europe. But conservatives are trying to erase history while claiming that it’s “the left” who is changing it.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You don’t believe Spain is part of Europe, or you’re insisting that their comment must mean something beyond it literally said?

            Because their comment was ultimately just about the fact that there was more than enough contact between Africa and Europe for random black people to be Arthurian knights or whatever. And that’s just a fact.

            This might really grind your gears: There were even black Vikings.

            There’s evidence of Viking slave raids and trading expeditions in the Mediterranean, specifically on the North African and Southern Spanish coasts, not to mention all the contact they had with Byzantium.

            So, yes, there were a lot of black people in medieval Europe. Just not as a notable percentage of the total population outside of Southern Spain, but in the sense that even today a couple thousand people is still a lot of people.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I’m saying Spain having Moors doesn’t really warrant saying Medieval Europe (as a whole) had “a lot of black people” imo.

              So, yes, there were a lot of black people in medieval Europe. Just not as a notable percentage of the total population outside of Southern Spain, but in the sense that even today a couple thousand people is still a lot of people.

              Just not as a notable percentage of the total population

              Indeed. A couple of thousand today is definitely not a sensible metric for “a lot”, since that’s an incredible tiny population compared to overall.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                And I’m saying they didn’t say that. Because they didn’t.

                You’re saying that, because you’re invested for some reason in black people not being on screens in a fictional world.

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  It’s just when someone says there was a lot of black people in Medieval Europe it does peak ones interest because there really wasn’t by how you’d first think of what “a lot” means.

                  You’re saying that, because you’re invested for some reason in black people not being on screens in a fictional world.

                  It can be a bit funny and seem inaccurate is all. If someone wants to put in black people to such setting or whites to Ancient Chinese setting or whatever then by all means. It just might not accurately represent the typical situation at the time.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also, people from the Mediterranean routinely traveled to Africa, and vice versa. It wasn’t all the time but it was common. It’s like traveling between the US and Latin America. They’re different areas of the world but so close that mixing is impossible to avoid. Sicily has a measurable amount of African heritage.

      • grandkaiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        The comparison to modern travel is a bit off though… The vast, VAST, majority of humanity would never travel further than a few villages over in their entire lifetime. The ‘mixing’ of cultures isn’t nearly as pronounced as you’re suggesting. Consider that even medieval “France” was made up of over 6 distinct cultures with often different languages.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Before the Caliphates happened and christendom responded by creating the north south division, it was entirely unreasonable to view any part of the Mediterranean as distinct from the greater cultural whole aside from specifics about who specifically was living where at what time.

        In fact Islamic empires regularly had an irredentist idea about their right to dominate the Mediterranean granted by being the true inheritors of the Roman Empire (especially after they took Istanbul)

        Even in that time of division though, the typical Venetian had far more in common with the Typical Tunisian than they did with the typical Dane. Could even be part of how the “Protestant World” ended up looking so similar to a map of “the parts of Europe that were the least integrated into the Mediterranean core of Catholicism’s historical forming grounds and institutions”

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not in medieval England, or other Northern European countries. They existed but they very much stood out. And most fantasy settings tend to be northern European.

      It would be fucking cool to see a medieval Spanish style fantasy setting though.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Please define “a lot”, for the claim that in Northern Europe or England there was a lot of black people.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    One of Arthur’s knights is literally from Africa

    Granted he was portrayed as having vitiligo instead of just being biracial (his dad was a white guy who was a famous traveling knight)

    Point still stands though, the historians of the day themselves literally saw nothing weird about that other than “oh yeah this cool guy came to the court from Africa too. His armor is a bit fancy and decorative but he swears it’s a symbol of the pride his Queen wanted to project for his country.”

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Correct me if I’m wrong but you mean Feirefiz? Who is a Saracen knight who attends a feast held by King Arthur and not one of Arthur’s knights?

      I wouldn’t refer to Wolfram von Eschenbach a historian either.

    • I always found his descriptions very funny, or, not really the description itself, but the thought process of the original storytellers it reveals.

      “Well there’s people with light skin and people with dark skin, so when they mix… The baby looks like… A cow?”

      Although, now I actually wonder, did they know better and this was just something to make Feirefiz stand out?

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        What happens when your one black friend also happens to have Vitiligo and has a mischievous streak for people who ask if everyone in Africa looks like him