• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Do the dandelion dance! Blast techno! Wear a speedo! Celebrate nature’s bounty, yo!!

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Maybe overall, but my little Chihuahua/dachshund is too short to deal with taller plants. When we go for a walk by areas with natural growth or even unmowed lawns, he either has to leap through it or walk in the road. I’m sure there are some other options he would be fine with, I don’t think grass is necessary, but he is definitely not just as happy with any other kind of nature.

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      The point is to make home ownership too expensive for black people by wasting land

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Lawns became symbols of the elite in England, as wealthy landowners sought to show off their gains via the most ostentatious displays possible outside stately homes.

      Colonizing landowners were keen to replicate the look of a manicured English garden. As such, English imperialism is somewhat to blame for lawns being created around the world, where they became a status symbol, and a sign of wealth and well-to-do.

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 months ago

          The point from from old England’s perspective is that keeping the grass at 2 cm requires a whole bunch of resources and people, so only the rich could afford it. Even today, any neighborhood with weeds growing instead of a 2cm lawn is instantly classified as lower class. There often is no practical use or sometimes use for games or walking is when forbidden because it’s a status symbol only.

          It’s like asking what’s the point of owning a Bugatti Chiron that can go 400 kph when you’re stuck in the same traffic jam anyway.

        • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          it’s easier to walk in than a garden with only 100cm-long grass in it

          also looks nicer than a barren garden with no grass

        • CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          That is the point. You’re basically trying to say “Look how rich I am, I can afford to have all this land dedicated to looking pretty and not being useful for anything else”

        • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          It goes back to the origin stated here. It was desirable because they could afford to effectively waste a lot of acreage on a crop that had no benefit. Simply for show.

  • Chocrates@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 months ago

    Dandelion greens are really good for you. Plus as others have noted monoculture lawns are pretty bad for the environment. Better than impermeable surfaces but still not great.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m sure there must be some based HOAs out there that encourage this sort of thing instead of forbidding it. You just have to not live in Normieville.

          • LasagnaCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I pay an HoA, its like $30 a year. While they dont encourage it, they dont care either. They really dont do anything except twice a year they bring out garbage trucks/dumpsters to the nearby school to dump/recycle things too big for a trash can.

            • Lupus108@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              In Germany the city does that at least in smaller cities. Twice a year you can put all stuff that doesn’t go into regular trash out at the street and it gets collected. Think broken furniture, old electronics etc. People empty their garages and basements of all the stuff that accumulated. It’s common to have a walk through the neighborhood on these days to see if there is some cool stuff in there. Got my first skateboard that way as a teenager.

            • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              I don’t see why it would have to be though. A bunch of oddballs could certainly get together and create one to protect diversity in their neighborhood from a normie invasion.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                For the same reason why very few companies are worker owned co-ops: people suck and capitalism doubly so. That’s why we very rarely can have nice things.

                In the case of HOAs, the bad ones (which are the vast majority of them) exist to extract profit (in the form of increasing property values, fining anyone who doesn’t follow their petty rules, and sometimes even take someone’s home for breaking the aforementioned rules) and exert as much control over people as possible.

                In the US at least, laws regarding HOAs are a grotesque combination of under-regulation and regulations specifically crafted to FACILITATE abuse rather than discourage it.

                • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Perhaps, but as long as there is no law that says you can’t have an HOA that fines you for having a McMansion with a monoculture lawn instead of a natural one, it’s at least possible in theory.

              • DannyMac@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                7 months ago

                The most well-intentioned HOAs can easily go to shit when power-tripping assholes, with all the free time in the world, take them over.

  • no banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    7 months ago

    Dandelions actually do important work for your lawn. They break up the hardened soil to make the ground softer for the grass to grow in. Letting dandelions grow will lead to a more beautiful lawn.

  • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    It doesn’t say what to do with them… If I see something like that with no context, I’m breeding ginormous people-eating dandelions…

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’re technically an invasive species in North America. Been around long enough now that they could maybe be considered native. If you’re looking to do a natural lawn in NA, though, you should probably still consider them a weed.

    • DannyMac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, I don’t even get mad at them any more. They are hardcore survivors and proliferators, and will have a welcome haven in my lawn to piss off dick neighbors like in the post

      • Somethingcheezie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I heard their pollen doesn’t provide enough nutrients for the hive/queen. Specifically protein.

        Here’s a link to neat bee article. Go pollinators!

        https://www.gardenmyths.com/dandelions-important-bees/

        Protein contains amino acids, and some of these amino acids are essential. That means the organism can not make them; they have to get them in food. Dandelion pollen is low in valine, isoleucine, leucine and arginine, essential amino acids for honey bees.

        Dandelion is consider a poor quality source of protein for bees.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s true, but it’s better than no flowers. I see this comment pop up pretty regularly in reference to dandelions as a source for pollinators as if eliminating the flower would be of little impact. Dandelions are one of the first flowers to show up for the pollinators, even if they don’t provide the best food for insects it’s still something, especially in sterile modern suburban landscapes. .

          • Somethingcheezie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            That link lists the first foods for pollinators. Lots of things on that list which surprised me. We’re replanting our yard with native plants this year. If you like birds and wildlife this is the best way to attract them.

            I also learned this year dandelions aren’t native to North America.