• fishos@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      A triangle with 90° angles, yes.

      But not a four sided TRIANGLE. That itself is a contradiction.

      • TheDankHold@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        One of the angles is 180 though so imagine what the two sides joined there would look like. After all this isn’t to scale.

        • fishos@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can’t make a 3 sided object with 4 sides. It’s no longer a triangle and is a square. It’s the definitions themselves. Non-euclidian geometry would allow the angles to equal more than 180°, but not to “add a side”.

          • simplecyphers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mathematicians dont want to to know this one strange trick, hide a secret corner of 180 degrees in any triangle to instantly make it a quadrilateral, without even changing the shape!!

          • W1Z_4RD@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Not to scale”

            . .

            Incase that is still a mystery to you, that means that the drawing is visually inconsistent with the finished part. That 180 degree ‘corner’ is effectively a straight line, if drawn to scale.

              • mozzarellamommy@waveform.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                My school used to put a right angled triangle in the test and then say “not to scale” and then the angles would actually make it an isosceles or whatever. I agree with you that scale should keep proportions but yeah for some reason It’s not common knowledge.

              • simplecyphers@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Technically you are “right” but you are also being obtuse (pun intended).

                If you could bare to stretch your mind, and realize “not to scale” means “trust the numbers, not the graphic” you could in turn, realize that it is, in fact, 3 sided.

                Every side of every shape is made up of infinite 180 degree angles and 2 angles that are different. Every. Single. One.

    • radix@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why does it have to be non-Euclidean geometry? It seems like it would work fine as a regular (normal? Euclidean?) 30-30-60 triangle.

      Edit: I can’t read. 30-60-90 triangle.

    • Lorgres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The 180° angle is just a (really weird) way of representing a long, straight, line. The rest of the angles add up to 180°.