• edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    without causing harm to animals

    • Humans are animals
    • Growing me-steak and eating it causes psychic damage
    • Therefore, an animal was harmed
    • Ziglin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t think you can generalize that. I’d love to have little me-steaks and I’d even share them with friends, especially if they can be a Möbius strip.

      As long as the human chooses to grow their me-steaks themselves I see no issue.

    • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If we cultured cells from someone with an autocannibalism fetish, would it then be OK?

      Like I take 1d4 psychic damage whenever I see furries at cons, but I don’t think they should have to be banned

  • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    Remember that guy on Reddit who claims he had to have his leg amputated and he somehow got to keep it, and he and his friends cooked and ate it?

    That’s weird, but as long as it remains their own, or consenting others, I think it’s fine. The minute capitalism gets involved I think it becomes exploitative and unethical - long pork in the grocery store fundamentally should not be a thing.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      God help me if I live in some commie zone where they take my amputated body parts to give to everyone. I grew those and they’re mine! Fuck your science, I wanna eat my foot.

    • VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh come on veggist, I eat you and you eat me, in a consensual lab grown way.

      And I am just kidding, not even sure I am on board with this, i think eating lab grown cow meat would be less upsetting.

      • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s just frustrating. Despite study after study showing that consumption of meat leads to poor health, people keep doing it. It just reminds me of being an addict. Other people saying this causes less harm to other sentient beings are right I’ll conceded to that but based off everything I know, the consumption of meat isn’t an act of self love. I may just be sensitive because my mother is dying of stomach disease. Beans and rice vegan steps off soap box

        • x4740N@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Oh look cherry picked studies

          If you look hard enough you can find any study to support your claim with enough word crafting

          • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You need to learn what cherry picking is. These are studies funded by governments. Not meat packing corporations.

            But I’m sure I can post some PFAS studies you can deny too.

          • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            We’re humans, we can do anything we put our minds to. I’m not a geneticist nor nutritionist so there’s no way I could tell you for certain. But the more I think of this question the more Jeff Goldblum’s line from Jurassic Park comes to mind.

            “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should."

            • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Haha but it’s yummy! This would be the easiest way to get rid of agricultural meat production for ethical and environmental reasons.

              Of course for many species of cows it will be an extinction event.

              • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah and cocaine is fun to do too. Doesn’t mean it’s healthy.

                It wouldn’t end animal agriculture. It would just become the vinyl record collectors version of meat consumption.

                It saddens me that you believe the only reason for cows existence is because of humans.

                If I may suggest donating some time at your local animal sanctuary to meet a cow. Much like dogs or cats they each have very different personalities. They can be very cuddly if they get to know you. Like most herbivores they just want to have good vibes and enjoy their life.

                • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Sorry that was a bit hyperbole it would never be an all or nothing. You’d always have limited grass fed animal husbandry for milk and cheese. But my thought was that there should be some sort of rewilding effort for cows or Buffaloes or whatever their wild form even is or was in Europe.

                  And I was thinking in the way of harm reduction which is a tactic for drug. You won’t convince a majority of people to not want meant so the demand will be there. So practically artificial meat is the only way.

    • x4740N@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I knew one of you would show up in this post and make it all about you

      This post isn’t about you

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    What if I want to grow my steak into a hollow-cylinder shape, and also, not eat it, per-se?

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    I am going to say that it’s unethical for someone to eat others or themselves, lab grown or not, because the community members in a society want to 1) curtail or reduce suffering and 2) increase ways to promote better judgment and impulse controls.

    1 - We treat cattle and animals for food production with such contempt and disdain and cruelty, and if we were to start eating humans (lab grown, self-eating or otherwise) we’ll treat humans the same. Delegating some humans to be eaten, lab grown (by choice or not) or otherwise, is going to create a lot of societal strife and suffering. How does self-eating contribute to suffering? See reason 2.

    2 - People who consume others or themselves cannot be guaranteed to be devoid of sociopathic characteristics. Even if someone is just eating themselves, it blurs the line between food source and community member.

    I think it is the same as people who smoke or cut themselves to relieve stress—yes, whatever you’re doing is your choice and seemingly only affecting you. However, the second hand smoke/scarring in the case of the self-cannibal is their poor judgment and poor impulse control. We expect society members to exercise better judgment and impulse control because the way they think impacts everyone around them.

    Why does self-cannibalism seem like poor judgment? Think again of someone who cuts themselves to relieve stress. The way you treat your yourself, including your body, is a reflection of your state of mind. Only a narcissist would say that they’re in complete control of their mind, including the subconscious part, and so their self-eating will be harmless and not result in any bad behavior towards others, ever. We already know vegetarians have more empathy than meat eaters: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animal-emotions/201207/brain-scans-show-vegetarians-more-empathic-omnivores

    As mentioned, we have historically always treated animal sources of nutrition with disdain, contempt and cruelty. If someone feels that it’s okay for them to eat themselves using lab grown meat, I worry what kind of psychological interplay justifies that decision for them. Do they hate themselves? Is this self-harm? What will their interactions with other people be like after doing this?

    So, yes autonomy and self-actualization is an inherent right of cognitively advanced beings. But they lose that right the second it starts impacting someone else’s self-actualization.

    In short, even self-cannibalism is unethical because society wants members who are not sociopaths and who won’t contribute to the suffering of other members.

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      How is this any way self-harm? To be clear we aren’t talking about growing a whole person here as you seem to be confused. We are talking about a few cells in a petri dish or vat. This is all just psychobabble nonsense. You’re the one here who shouldn’t be in polite society.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        How can you qualify that it’s not self harm? Maybe we need to do brain scan study of what it looks like for people who cut themselves vs those who eat meat grown from their cells.

        • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Because it doesn’t physically harm me to do so. Cutting yourself is physically painful and damaging to your body. Growing cells in a pitri dish to save on dinner is neither of those things.

            • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Okay now you’ve really lost me? How in the hell is that emotional self harm? If anything I’d take it as a self-compliment that I taste good :p

              • nifty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                So, if self-cannibalism of lab grown meat is allowed, then cannibalism of lab grown meat (so cells from other people) would also be allowed.

                Think of how we treat other sources of animal derived foods, it’s pretty shitty and cruel treatment. In this case, the person chooses to eat self sourced or other person sourced lab grown meat because eating a real person would be murder, and cutting themselves up would be physical self harm.

                The question is what is the underlying psychological justification for them deciding to eat lab grown human meat. Is it that they’re avoiding physical pain and murder? Lab grown animal meat is there to substitute for animal meat. But what’s the justification for lab grown human meat? Novelty? Taste? Psychological issues? How do we trust this persons judgement for themselves and others?

                The issue is that human societies veered away from cannibalism for social issues, and so how do we trust those people who would engage in some form of cannibalism, even if it’s their own lab grown cells.

                Some context which also gives European views on first encounters and how the social revulsion to this idea was established https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/making-of-an-imperial-polity/cannibalism-and-the-politics-of-bloodshed/D4D05AE81BBADD074FBCDC09504605D3

                • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I fail to see how we treat meat animals as relevant. No ones going to be caged and mistreated because there’s no reason to.

                  The fact your eating human meat isn’t enough to cause psychological issues when no one was harmed, and the idea that it does is fucking laughable.

                  Unless someone is actually mistreated, which again no practical reason to, as getting a microscopic sample to grow from is harmless. Where would this psychological damage come from? Because it would remind us of the animals we did kill and eat? That’s fucking goofy. The psychological harm of cannibalism IS FROM THE PHYSICAL HARM BEING DONE TO THE OTHER PERSON. NOTHING ELSE. THATS IT.

                  Eating something that harmlessly grew from my body isn’t going to impose psychological damage, nor does it imply I lack empathy for myself or those around me.

                  There’s ethically no difference between eating your own lab grown meat, and eating your own boogers. There’s ethically no difference between someone eating your own lab grown meat, and someone eating your boogers.

                  It doesn’t automatically put me in the same class as livestock. I’m not undermining my humanity, nor does it mean I don’t care for myself. Your hang ups are your own. Get the fuck over yourself.

                  This almost reminds me of the weird psychosexual hangups incels have but for vegans. Imposing meaning where there is none, Jesus fucking Christ dude.

    • x4740N@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Stop brigading posts nifty

      People will eat meat if they want to, you can’t stop them and at the end of the day brigading annoys people and disrupts social media

      It’s the exact same thing you and your group did on reddit

      Just stop brigading posts and stop mass downvoting any posts that contain meat, I’ve looked at the vote ratios of posts in food subs enough to know that it is being done

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        What the fuck are you on about? I am only on lemmy, and don’t use any other boards.

        You’re the one lying about me and brigading.

        Maybe you’re a stooge sent by big-Cannibalism to help make this tech popular? See, I can make baseless claims too 🙄

    • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wait. Isnt this infinite food? Cut off 1cm2 of skin, grow a steak, and ‘free’ dinner? Lets actually read thw article.

      • matt1126@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You would have to “feed” it nutrition while it grows into the steak, so not infinite and not free unfortunately

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    auto cannibalism? %100 sure there will be tv shows about who has the best taste and the texture as well as onlyfans models selling cells from different parts of their body for astronomic prices

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean you have to buy it on your own accord, culture your own cells, and then successfully cook and eat them. As long as you aren’t stealing other people’s cells to eat them without their consent it seems more ethical than the current meat industry.

    • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      ·
      4 months ago

      stealing other people’s cells to eat them

      This will become a sex thing for sure

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      As long as you aren’t stealing other people’s cells to eat them without their consent it seems more ethical than the current meat industry.

      Even if you did, while super weird as long as you didn’t get the cells through violence it’s probably still more ethical than the meat industry.

    • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      But it’s still cannibalism, yeah? If someone consented to be eaten before they died or even wished for it, would you be OK with eating them?

      • Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        So, if it were the original cells, then it would be autocannibalism, since these are cloned cells (from what I gather) it’s technically not the same thing. [Edit: Personally, it’s a bit of a tossup in my mind. I don’t think it’s unethical, but it’s still a weird thing]

        • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, I’m also unsure how I feel about it, I asked because it’s such a strange thing to think about

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        We have to draw some sort of line here though. Will this give you prions? Does this end the person’s life like traditional cannibalism usually does? Theres a lot to unpack in these tiny man steaks. I’d still rather people be growing their own meat at home in a petri dish than having animals locked in cages for eternity.

        • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 months ago

          In the current hypothetical:

          1. It’s screened, you can’t legally sell prion meat

          2. It’s taken nonlethally as a sample from a consenting human, possibly you

      • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        This is unironically one of my favourite questions to ask new friends. I’ve gotten a variety of answers, but my own response has always been yes, if the person was healthy and had clearly consented.

        In my opinion, cannibalism is bad for two main reasons, 1) it can be unsafe if the person was ill, the meat has spoiled, or if it’s done too often (this has been studied in cannibalistic rituals) and 2) it’s unethical if the person doesn’t consent to it.

        Eating animal meat is non consensual and there can be diseases in there too - many people have died from it. Just because it’s more socially acceptable, I don’t really see it as an ethically better decision.

        I would 100% at least try my own home grown meat cells.

        • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Damn, I love your response, even though I don’t know of I agree! Are you Vegan?

          I personally see it as No, because I see us humans as special. Speaking as an atheist, end of day, we are special as humans.

          I eat meat, I try to limit it to the ethically harvested. Hunted, family farm grown, it even tastes the best, any concerns aside. But eating a person is WRONG, consent or no.

          • Farid@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Why is it wrong though? And why/how are people special? You didn’t provide any reasoning to either.

          • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m not vegan or vegetarian anymore because I have a lot of allergies that prevent me from eating plant based anything. But I also try to limit it to locally and ethically harvested when I do eat meat.

            I identify as agnostic and definitely don’t believe that any one living being is better or more special than the others (except maybe cats).

          • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s interesting that you ask if they are vegan, as if understanding the ethical problems of eating meat would only be valid if you are also strictly vegan.

            You evidently understand it is not completely ethically correct to eat animals in all circumstances, as you say you only eat ethically harvested meat. But you also say you believe humans to be special as a reason to eat animals, so why not eat all animals under all circumstances?

            The main point though, why would it still be wrong to eat human meat if lab grown and consensual?

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Art project from 2020 - intended to provoke the conversations here for sure. Still involves some animal products in production it looks like.

    I don’t think this could be feasibly upscaled to sustain a dystopia.