If David Cameron can come back and be relevant again, I guess any sufficiently aristo Brit can.
Those last three words of the headline are doing some heavy lifting here
Bo Jove, I think he’s got it!
I feel like he changed his mind when he saw how upset i was while reading through the first half
Right? I had to unsigh hard to regain equilibrium.
Somebody is not getting their regular
bribespayments anymoreBased Boris
edit: I was joking 🥲
Never. The dude being right once doesn’t absolve him of shit. Fuck him.
Removed by mod
Ya boy looks like he half way to becoming a sith lord. Somebody get this man an espresso.
I was enjoying not hearing from this buffoon way too much, just like I will enjoy not hearing about Trump one day.
So I’ll just go:’ oh no anyway’ on this one and hope the next but about him is further in the future.
I will admit that I am confounded by how often I agree with Boris Johnson’s views on providing military aid to Ukraine, considering I almost always vehemently disagree with him on pretty much anything and everything else.
Well foreign policy and domestic policy are two completely different things.
Even a broken watch is right twice a day
Yeah he’s one of the very few Western politicians who is taking the threat Russia poses to European security seriously. I found it unexpected tbh considering all of his other views.
What a horribly written title
Dickhead, dickhead, dickhead, no wait, legend!
… to be lifted.
It was written by M. Night Shyamalan.
Not gonna lie, that headline had me on the first half. I was getting mad up until the last three words.
And it’s so easily fixable too. “Boris Johnson calls to lift ban on Ukraine using”… etc. or just move “to be lifted” immediately after “ban”.
But then it wouldn’t be click bait.
Yeah, it’s a rollercoaster.
Yup
Mmm-hm.
deleted by creator
My instinctive hostility towards anything he does or says
When it came to the Ukraine situation, he has, in general, not missed a beat.
The UK has given an impressive amount of gear to the Ukrainians given the size of the UK military, whilst everyone else was dithering and wondering what to give and how much to ensure they still had some stuff at home, the UK attitude was “give them all the things and we’ll worry about it later”.
Obviously countries like Poland had to be more cautious.
A lot of training and intelligence has been given to Ukraine as well. The UK continues to host Ukrainian troops for training.
The UK even made binding “boots on the ground” support agreements to Norway and Sweden in case Russia tried anything during their NATO membership process.
UK gave a bunch of Challenger 2 tanks with “do what you like with them” terms, not just “pwease don’t shooty shoot on Wussian tewwitory” nonsense. This was a token gesture as actually Ukraine really wanted the German stuff but it opened the door a bit to basically embarrass Germany into getting it’s act together.
As much as I don’t like the man, Johnson did well when it came to supporting Ukraine, and credit should be given where it is due.
Yes, I think we can all be thankful that all of the major British political parties were united on the need to support Ukraine. As my Ukrainian friends will always point out - Don’t think of it as Europe “helping” Ukraine - instead think of it as Ukraine taking the brunt of Russian aggression to save Europe.
It a definite instance where keeping the preposition in (“the ban on”) would have been clearer.
I’m not a fan of the guy but he had to say something sensible eventually.
Broken clock…
These limitations on Ukraine really need to be lifted. Ukraine needs freedom to attack the best strategic targets they can, whether they are in Ukraine occupied areas or in Russia. Since Russia annexed the occupied territories, there’s not a big difference anyway.
The only problem I see is that it’s escalatory. If Ukraine starts using Western-supplied weapons for offensive operations, this situation goes from supplying war material for defense (under-the-table proxy war) to full-on overt proxy war. Russia will spin this as “NATO is using Ukraine to attack us” (though they’re probably doing that already).
I can’t see how this won’t lead to a wider conflict.
The only problem I see is that it’s escalatory
Wasn’t invading Ukraine escalatory in the first place?
K. Russia cant even defend itself from Ukraine. Lets transition to the find out stage.
They already use that rhetoric for a long time.
I’m sure you’re right.
How do we use our understanding of that, and the way that they operate, to avoid a full scale war?
We already crossed many times their “red lines”. This is just the good old “China’s Final Warning”.
They are already barely managing to slowly advance against a single foe, which is still transitioning between the old soviet warfare ways toward NATO’s one, with far less soldiers, I doubt they would ever hold against the full alliance firepower.
There IS a full scale war going on. 31,000 confirmed dead Ukranian soldiers, and up to 120,000 dead Russian soldiers. We don’t even have a good idea how many civilian deaths, but the total death toll could be as high as 500,000.
And no, before you start - Mutually Assured Destruction isn’t “a full scale war”. Its Annihilation of both sides, and has no precedent in the history of war.
Full scale in the sense that Putin gets NATO involved.
If Nato got involved directly Moscow would be leveled in a month.
Aaaannnd . . . ?
Putin can’t even hold his own territory. I don’t think even he would open another front by attacking a NATO member even if the west started greenlighting their weapons be used in the incursion.
Bro fucking russian troll, stfu
deleted by creator
If only Russia left Ukraine, everything would be much easier…
You can thank Putin for making it go this far.
Time he pays the piper.
Boris calling for escalation again when he’s the one who talked zelensky out of a peace deal earlier in the war? Nooo.
Ukrayinska Pravda (The Ukrainian Truth) - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Ukrayinska Pravda (The Ukrainian Truth):
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Ukraine
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
Doesn’t Storm Shadow require Western operators to program targets? I want Ukraine to win this war of national survival (unlike the US administration) but Western operators programming missiles to hit targets in Russia does sound escalatory to me. I’d rather see Ukraine receive a decent number of F16s (i.e. much more than currently pledged) with corresponding munitions. There’s a lot of really useful stuff in the Western arsenal that would otherwise remain unused forever, including older-gen glide bombs & standoff weapons. It’s not going to be the Wunderwaffen winning this war, anyway. But an ample supply of decent weapons could work wonders. Just look at the success of Russia’s cheap glide bomb upgrades. (Sorry for the wall of text, by the way, but I can’t get Connect for Android to retain line breaks)
