• JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    So if these are people wiring their Christmas lights wrong, assuming these are led lights, doesn’t this “solution” not work bc of the polarity anyway? Or is that only a DC thing with diodes? I only did okay in my physics electricity stuff lol

    • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      For simple stuff such as those lights, polarity is usually not a problem when using AC.

      In case of AC (Alternating Current), instead of having a + and - pole, you have a Line and a Neutral terminal.

      The Line terminal goes + … - … + … - … + … - with time and the Neutral stays at 0.

      When connecting to LEDs and such, you have an AC to DC converter, which tends to be fine no matter which pin you put in which hole.

      Anti Commercial-AI license

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        In household wiring polarity does matter, especially if you are assembling plugs. Only one of the three wires is carrying live current (hot), the other two are the neutral return path, and ground which is for safety. If you accidentally switch polarity, you can cross hot to neutral and cause a short circuit.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Switching the neutral and hot pins doesn’t matter except for appliances with exposed metal tied to the neutral pin, which is pretty much exclusive Edison screw lamps. This is why many plugs (especially those that immediately go to a rectifier) don’t bother with polarization.

          Swtching hot and ground is a problem

        • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          My bad. I wasn’t clear enough.

          I was talking about 2 pin plugs, as shown in the post and how it is usually for those cheap lighting thingies.

    • brianorca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It would still work. But it is VERY dangerous. 1. The far end of the light string will now have exposed metal prongs that are energized at 120v, which can be fatal. 2. If the other end gets plugged into a socket, there is a 50% chance it will be a different circuit on a different phase, which can create a 240v direct short, across a wire that has no properly sized circuit breaker. 3. Using it to plug a generator into your house during a power outage can kill electrical workers trying to fix the outage if you fail to open your circuit breakers.

        • brianorca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          In AC, diodes work half the time, every 1/60 second. The “good” LEDs will have circuitry to fully rectify the AC into DC, drop the voltage properly, and smooth the peaks and valleys, so they will be continuously lit. So the cheap LED Christmas lights might have a slight flicker, and the good ones are steady. (Or get fancy with chasing colors, etc.)

          All of that happens inside each of the “bulb” enclosures, or sometimes in a box at one end, so it technically doesn’t matter which end they are getting electricity from, since the socket at the far end is still just connected in parallel to the plug at the near end. (Otherwise you wouldn’t be able to link them together.)

          It’s just a really bad dangerous idea to reverse them.

  • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I worked at an electrical supply store foe a while. The amount of people trying to make these is really way too damn high. At least once a week.

  • Davidchan@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    On the one hand, there are legitimate uses for double ended male cords. On the other, absolutely none of those legit uses invovle christmas lights

      • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        generator hookup shouldn’t be one of those, as shouldn’t proper generator transfer switches have plugs designed so you don’t need a suicide cable?

  • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I used it to connect a generator to the wall and give me some temporary power in my house when I was renovating. It’s only dangerous if you are stupid.

    • Steak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not smart. You could kill yourself or some poor electrician working the problem outside your house somewhere.

    • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      The backup-generator seems to be the one semi-legit use-case that keeps coming up where few people have been able to present a significantly better alternative.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s literally an approved solution to the problem designed explicitly to solve the problem.

        Install a transfer switch so you can disconnect utility power, switch to your generator and people can see the situation at the breaker.

        If you don’t have one, you use something called an “extension cord” to run power to your important devices for the duration of the outage.
        If you don’t know how to power a few appliances with a generator and some extension cords, you definitely shouldn’t be thinking you can use a dangerous cable that people who do know you should never use in the first place.

      • hypeerror@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        The safe method for a generator is a transfer switch. With that cable you make your circuit breaker useless and could also send power back out to the street and harm someone working on the problem.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just because you didn’t get hurt doesn’t mean it wasn’t dangerous.

      There’s a reason the people who write the fire and electrical codes say that if you need to do something like that, you need to have a properly installed transfer switch.

      • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean, driving a car is dangerous, everything has a risk inherent to it but you can minimise it by being prudent.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, you minimize risk by being prudent and using reasonable and cost effective safety measures.

          In a car, that’s things like seatbelts, airbags, and other safety features.

          The equivalent for powering your house with a generator is the aforementioned transfer switch.

          What you’re doing is saying that driving a car without seatbelts or airbags is perfectly safe, you just need to not get in an accident.

          Stop powering your house with a generator plugged in via the dumbest possible cable and just install a fucking transfer switch. They’re not expensive and it keeps you from needlessly endangering people, or even just having a preposterously dangerous cord laying around.

        • tills13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          You turn off the breaker. You plug your generator abomination into a receptacle. Your partner checks the panel – the breakers are off, it’s safe to work with the electrical! They kill themselves.

          You could just not be a threat to yourself and people around you.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    as someone who has strung a ton of lights the wrong way around on more than one occasion… I can understand the desire for some magic solution that doesnt require undoing and redoing your work…

    but fuck, You don’t mess around with electricity.

    People also make these stupid suicide cables to plug generators into houses during disasters, often backfeeding power into the lines that may be down and can cause serious injury to workers trying to restore power.

    • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, there is a reason why proper installations require actual transfer switches or at least a manual interlock to prevent both feeds being connected at the same time. I’m also not sure what would happen if your generator was out of phase with the grid when it reenergised, but I’m sure it wouldn’t be good

      • A7thStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        If your generator was connected to mains when they came back on it would probably just kill your generator. It is the least robust device in the chain. The next step is blowing up the transformer on the pole which is a spectacular light show. It is also very expensive, and will piss off your entire neighborhood who were just about to get power back and now have to wait for the power company to fix the transformer you blew up by being a dumb ass. Finally it is possible that you would trip out the switch yard which is going to make even more people angry. The biggest risk is you putting power back on the lines that people are working on. That transformer on the pole works both directions. It drops the usual 13.8kV on your local power lines to the 240/120V in your house. It will also turn the 120/240 from your generator into 13.8 on the lines that are being worked on. 13.8 will kill you before you even know you touched it. That is why line workers go through multiple tests before they get near lines they are working on. They will notice there is power on lines that are supposed to be dead. They will find where that power is coming from. They will fine you lots of money. There may be criminal charges.

      • brianorca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        If someone can’t make the own cord, what’s the chance they know how vital it is to flip the breaker?

      • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You can, but if forgetting to flip a switch can result in death, then you need a stronger safety control

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Someone incompetent enough to forget to shut off the main shouldn’t be operating a generator anyway.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Someone who’s not competent enough to install a proper transfer switch (or at least hire a professional to do it) shouldn’t be operating a generator.

          • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s not the point. Normal, sensible people make mistakes because they are tired or stressed or got distracted or just plain unlucky, so things have to be designed so that people can make a mistake and it not instantly create a potentially lethal situation

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t really get it. Sure, the exposed prongs would be energized once you plugged one side in, but if you plugged the other side into a second outlet (assuming you didn’t cross live/neutral), nothing would happen. (those two outlets were likely tied together anyway)

    • Davidchan@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Double live is very bad and the cord becomes a literal short. If you’re lucky a breaker will flip or fuse burn out. If you’re not so lucky you have a cable thats either going to start a fire burning its insulation off and melting itself, or potentially exploding depending on quality and type of cable.

    • Metype @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The problem really is the super exposed hot prong you now have once you plug one end in

    • Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, maybe it’s because you may die if you accidentally touched touched the prongs? The purpose of female plugs is among other reasons to prevent accidentally touching them.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      In addition to the exposed prongs, it also means you are passing current into a circuit of unknown capacity without using a safety breaker. You may also be back feeding into your neighborhood power grid and can kill people in the street/other houses that were not expecting the lines to be energized.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 months ago

      You don’t work around dangerous things assuming you’ll never make a mistake, you work around dangerous things assuming you’ll never make three mistakes at the same time.

      You are not immune to making one (or more) mistakes, no matter how careful you think you are.

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Correction: you don’t work around dangerous things assuming you’ll make a mistake long

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      50-50 chance whether those two outlets are on the same phase or opposite faces; if it’s the latter, congrats, that’s a 240V short.

      Besides, if there’s an outlet at the far end of your strong of lights, you don’t need this, you just plug it in there

    • brianorca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Two things: 1: there’s a high chance you do cross live and neutral, or even live and live on different phases. 2: using it to plug in a generator to power your house can kill electrical workers who are trying to restore a power outage. (If you fail to open your circuit breaker.)

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh I call the cables I use to wire up my controllers “suicide cords” because it’s just the hot, neutral, and ground hanging out one end, waiting to touch me…