At a crucial juncture of the war against Russia, President Volodymyr Zelensky has undertaken a major reshuffle of his government, insisting “new energy” in government was needed “today.”

“These steps are only associated with strengthening our state in various sectors — international politics and diplomacy are no exception,” he said on Sept. 4 during a press conference in Kyiv with Irish Prime Minister Simon Harris.

While lawmakers and political analysts close to the president told the Kyiv Independent the reshuffle is a way of bringing “new energy” to a tired government apparatus, those who are critical of Zelensky say it’s more about the President’s Office, run by Andriy Yermak, willing to consolidate power even more.

MBFC
Archive

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago
    Kyiv Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Kyiv Independent:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - Ukraine
    Wikipedia about this source

    Media Bias/Fact Check - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Media Bias/Fact Check:

    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-reshuffles-its-government-whos-out-whos-in-and-what-it-all-means/
    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/kyiv-independent-bias/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I really, really, really hope that Zelenskyy rides off into the sunset the day after this war is over and goes into history as a hero. He was outstanding in early 2022 and has been okay since then, but there are moments when power seems to be going to his head.

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Whoever fights monsters should see to it that he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”

      -Nietzsche

      The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.

      -Hannah Arendt

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      He’s by definition an autocrat at this point.

      He didn’t have an election and just remained in power.

      A reminder for those who will automatically respond “Ukraine is fighting for its life”

      It definitely is, but the US had an election in the middle of the Civil War, and during WW2.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        But during WW2 Britain didn’t hold elections. Did this turn Britain into an autocracy?

        And by the way, you literally can’t hold elections if the aggressor is certain to attack polling stations. The US never had this threat, neither during the Civil War nor during WW2. Not a single US city was ever attacked by an enemy nation.

        • Irremarkable@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not a single US city was ever attacked by an enemy nation.

          This is definitely an um ackushally, but the Brits did burn the capitol.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Huh, that list actually has Goleta. I’m a bit surprised about that.

            Good on Wikipedia.

          • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Pearl Harbor is not a city, is it?

            I’ve checked nearly every single link from Wikipedia in that list, there were a handful of attacks on American villages. Not a single city was ever attacked (except for maybe Washigton by the Brits) - or rather seriously attacked.

            I don’t really take

            Casualties:

            • 1 death
            • 3 wounded
            • damaged bridge

            seriously, considering that attacks on cities usually end horribly for civilians.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Goleta, CA. WW2

          Not really a counter argument, but you’re wrong about the whole not a single city bit.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Churchill led a fucking empire, and during that same time period chose to starve 4 million what would become Bengali’s.

          Like, I see the argument you’re making, but the British fucking empire is not the example you want to use.

          • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, that does make Churchill a genocidal British imperialist but not an autocrat.

            Not that that’s any better - but the original comment claimed not holding elections in tines of war => autocracy.

            I don’t really know about other democratic nations in WW2 that suspended elections - like 3/4 of Europe had their governments dissolved and couldn’t quite hold elections.

      • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ukraine’s constitution forbids an election during a state of emergency. This isn’t him overriding precedent, this is codified into law.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        The US didnt have to account for the likelihood of russian psyops and election interference destabilizing the country during these critical times though.