It’s not fishy (at least not intentionally so). It’s a limitation of their database. It can only show 1000 comments. So it won’t find your very old posts when you sort by them.

So they’re not restoring comments. It’s just very difficult to find your old comments to actually delete them.

I disagree, because there are some fugly people out there. Boobs are certainly no longer good boobs when the nipple is below her belly button.

And even within imax, there’s differing qualities of the projector. It’s all quite complicated and seems to be intentionally obfuscated.

It’s not fine if it’s what’s used in the title. It’s fine to include it as part of the post, but only including the surface temp in the title is misleading.

It’s not as of right now, but I wouldn’t say downvotes are the issue. The reality is that downvote = disagree no matter what rule you create that says it doesn’t.

What I’m talking about are the insults, mischaracterizations, and general non productive discussion on comments that others don’t agree with.

Yep. Unless you’re trying to cook eggs on the ground, then you can start letting people know when it finally gets hot enough to do that.

If you really want to test it, then you’ve got to post an opinion that disagrees with both of the two main dominant opinions and is a bit more complex rather than just staunchly for/against something.

So say that you’re against abortion, except advocate strongly for it in the event of rape or mental disabilities. And say that you’re not against gay people, but against same sex marriage and gay people should just be celibate their whole lives.

And if you really want to ruffle some feather, say that you don’t think pedophiles should be put in jail. Only child molesters/rapists should be jailed.

That hasn’t been my experience.

It’s still a very mixed reaction if you say something contrary to the dominant opinion.

And still just as likely to get strawmanned if you disagree with an aspect, but still overall agree with the conclusion.

Nope, not at all. You completely misunderstood my point.

I’m not saying the ground suddenly got hotter and everything else stayed the same. In this case, it’s just a metric that’s quoted because it has a misleading high value especially by people who are just scrolling through.

It’s click bait.

Being friendly is far more effective than trying to punish people to make them agree with you. Especially when there’s no immediate and obvious consequence of their individual actions.

I wouldn’t say that at all. Chernobyl was so much worse than this. It wasn’t a single first line supervisor who asked one worker to do something who said no at first.

They’d asked multiple nuclear plants to perform that test. Been told that it was not safe to perform multiple times. They finally got an upper management individual at one plant to agree to it. Then they had challenges completing the test and due to plant characteristics that were not apparent to the operators (as well as violating other procedures) the event occurred.

The premise of chernobyl is a series of systemic failures of barriers. Not an addition of a single step not specified in a maintenence procedure.

Talking about surface temperature is pretty misleading.

We’ve had that experience in years past, but ended up picking several items that were the lowest price in 1 to 6 months.

There weren’t any crazy discounts, but it was better than nothing.

A lot of people get stuck with issues like that where there are conflicting principles.

They closer they walk the line, the longer they can drag this out before they’re replaced. That means more subscribers move on to other active communities.

I’ve been waiting for my third party app to break. Boost finally stopped working an hour ago so I signed up here.