Yeah that’s the real issue lol

What about the kitchen?

They’ve had two years to sort it out. No one’s fault but their own.

I can’t think of many other cases where you’d allow a country you’re at war with to use your territory for funding said war.

It’s like the whole giving them weapons but limiting how they can use them against the enemy. It’s absolutely insane.

What goes on between two or more non related consenting adults is no ones business but their own.

I’m sorry but they absolutely are.

They are neural networks which are some of the oldest AI tech we have.

You can hate them, but they are by definition AI.

They’d get absolutely flattened by everyone else. It would be an insanely short sighted move.

You guys can downvote all you want but this is going to further divide the country and bring him a lot more votes.

History has shown assassination attempts to do wonders for elections.

The tinfoil would stop it.

Wouldn’t that cut it’s communication though?

I can’t speak for the younger generation but as a millennial it’s used as both for sure.

Greeting a friend with “hey slut” is fine. Saying that to a stranger would likely not be.

Although the ultimate origin of the word slut is unknown, it first appeared in Middle English in 1402 as slutte (AHD), with the meaning of ‘dirty, untidy, or slovenly woman’.

It’s never been polite. Not sure what you mean.

Calling someone a derogatory term has never been acceptable in polite company. It doesn’t really make sense.

Although the ultimate origin of the word slut is unknown, it first appeared in Middle English in 1402 as slutte (AHD), with the meaning of ‘dirty, untidy, or slovenly woman’.

And slut has never had a positive meaning.

It pretty much is. If you ignore the culture / race part. Eugenics would be a more correct term.

I think the point is they don’t hate who they are. We don’t let them be themselves. They hate who they are forced to be.

Almost everyone cares deeply about their identity. People’s identities just pull from different things.

An equivalent would be banning a certain sport or type of music or food type, etc. that people identify with.

If they tried to ban football or rock music you can bet a lot of people would lose their minds.

That’s not what genocide means. You can’t come up with your own definition of a word then attack people for not using said made up definition.

That said genocide doesn’t quite fit as it’s not based on race or culture. Eugenics would be a more correct term.

The government literally covered up the massive leap in suicides since banning trans care for youths.

Bit more than not being represented.

The problem is they are also the aggressor and have been for decades.

Hamas and the Israeli government are both fucking awful.

Feels like a stretch to call carpet bombing civilians a great job.

I’m not that well read up on his stuff. What was he so wrong about?