• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rent control is absolutely not the solution. Building more is the solution.

    • SterlingVapor@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some estimates put the number of vacant homes upwards of 30% a few months back, and it’s been climbing

      It’s not about a lack of supply, it’s about homes being both an investment and a basic need - someone like Black Rock can go into a small town in Georgia, snap up every property that goes on the market, then dictate rental prices while jacking up the house prices by bidding on everything. Even if they greatly overpay, by doing it a few times it drives up the valuation of the entire area, overall making their net profit grow

      And it’s not just Black Rock, it’s a bunch of investment companies doing this everywhere. They have the same goal and their interests are aligned - they’re not competing for tenants, they just want to jack up the values and use homes like stock investments

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only for it to be snapped up by corporate interests and not handed to the families that actually need it.

      We need a list of all of the families and single people looking for a primary residence, build new housing, and just give it to them first. No buying allowed.

      • killa44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ehhh, you’ve got the right spirit, but that won’t happen lol.

        What would be useful is banning, or at least limiting, speculative real estate ownership. A liveable home being unoccupied for no productive reason is a massively arrogant thing for a society to allow.

    • Meldroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How about regulating all the big companies - prohibit sitting on apartments to drive up rents, limit Airbnbs,that sort of thing.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            “prohibit sitting on apartments to raise rent” which idk what it even theoretically means, and limiting AirBnBs, are both means of constraining housing.

    • eldenlord@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      you forgot that most country which has this house price problem actually build houses and apartment more than enough for all the homeless hence you would see lots of ghost town everywhere, economy now doesnt work as intended, you can build more house but without regulation despite the supply the price would still skyrocket like now

    • SterlingVapor@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some estimates put the number of vacant homes upwards of 30% a few months back, and it’s been climbing

      It’s not about a lack of supply, it’s about homes being both an investment and a basic need - someone like Black Rock can go into a small town in Georgia, snap up every property that goes on the market, then dictate rental prices while jacking up the house prices by bidding on everything. Even if they greatly overpay, by doing it a few times it drives up the valuation of the entire area, overall making their net profit grow

      And it’s not just Black Rock, it’s a bunch of investment companies doing this everywhere. They have the same goal and their interests are aligned - they’re not competing for tenants, they just want to jack up the values and use homes like stock investments