• Kevnyon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t the file limit 25MB these days? And yeah, I remember Skype having no limit on that but I also remember it taking an eternity and a half to transfer some of those files.

  • amenotef@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Recently I wanted to transfer one 20GB file to my brother and I ended up using FileZilla.

    But before that I tried some quick effortless solutions (like opening Skype/Teams and using that) and I failed.

    I miss opening the IM app and quickly transfer something.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fucking bane of my existence I swear, all my homies hate filesize limits.

    Fortunately we have a few options, some better than others, and if it helps one person Imma talk about it now.

    Magic-wormhole: My favorite, CLI client that shares files from your computer to a server to be downloaded with a password you send through your normal means of communication. No filesize limit, files stay on the server for 1h unless downloaded (deleted after download.) For sensitive information I would PGP it before I upload but I have trust issues.

    Warp: Magic wormhole, but GUI. Second favorite, only because I love my terminal so much. It’s literally just a GUI wrapper for magic wormhole though so no complaints from me. Works on windows too iirc, and the android wrapper for it is called just “wormhole” alone, no “magic.”

    Onionshare: Sends files directly from your pc to theirs, works through Tor. I have gotten it to work before, but sometimes it hates me and refuses to connect, usually when I try to DL from mobile.

    Soulseek: Not exactly private, but it works if you can forward a port. If you need privacy you’ll have to mark the files as private, probably name them something nondescript like “file1,” and set it so only your trusted buddies can download it, then whitelist the buddy you want to share it with for that time (would have to remove trust for buddies by default, only enabling the ones for the current file to be shared, then swap that again next time. Like I said it “works” but it’s far from ideal. Would also PGP them files to be safe.)

    Torrents: well we all know this one, it’s the classic!

    I’m probably forgetting some/don’t know some, so anyone else feel free to add!

    • Ricaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      The classic would probably be plain old FTP, but SFTP/SCP/SSH works fine as well.

      When I need to share files to newbs I usually just use a small Node script to host an HTTPS server from terminal, and give them a file link

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember being shown FTP back in high school and finding any reason at all to use it, in spite of the fact there were better alternatives for my friends to access certain files, especially considering I probably got the shit of Kazaa anyway. But we FTP’d, and it was slow most of the time, or slower than any of the shares, but it felt good.

  • lemmyworldwungo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is limitations of scylladb and their api service requirements.

    They haves something called a service agreement. That means the API is required to respond in 99% 99.999% etc. and by limiting to 8mb for files, charging for a bit more etc. they can both monetize and enforce guaranteed api requirements internally.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing that did it for me was the updated privacy policy scandal about how they could now store all the contents of voice recordings. Now they know exactly where I live, how much I make, everything. Never paying for Nitro again, and my activity there plummeted.

        • 0235@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why is everyone celebrating that companies are starting to keep voice recordings and chat records of users? It is mad.

        • Lukecis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dont forget they also harvest quite literally every single piece of data they possibly can about you- and if you install their app they collect information on everything else happening on your pc as well.

          Oh and the admins have been exposed as groomers and their platform is absolutely infested with pedophiles in general.

            • Lukecis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was going to ask “every platform is run by groomers and is infested by pedos?” but then I realized how close to true it is…

              No sense in fighting the ‘everyone collects and sells your data’ point however, considering yes- they all do, but some do far far more harvesting than others…

  • JshKlsn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the reason I’ve never used discord outside voice chatting with friends a few times per month.

    A basic photo from my phone is over the file size limit. It’s essentially unusable, and I’m not going to get me and my friends and family to all pay a subscription for a feature literally every other chat app provides for free. Sorry.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I fully expect Discord to pull a spez sometime in the future. Probably not as destructive and blatantly anti user as that asshole, but bad nonetheless. Gotta remember that even if it’s already self-sustainable with the current nitros, investors want ROI and they want it NOW.

    • JeffCraig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have supported Discord with a nitro subscription for as long as I’ve had an account. It’s a terrific program and there’s no reason to expect premium features for nothing in return. The mentality that everything should be free is why we have so many fucking ad driven online business models and I’m over it. I pay for what I use if it’s a good service.

      • krakenx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s the same reason I do. A place for friends to hang out online free from ads and algorithms manipulating the conversation is such a rarity these days. All the features they give you for free are nice enough I don’t mind tossing them a few bucks for a theme and an animated avatar hat. Hopefully if enough of us do, we can avoid the enshittening.

        That 8mb limit was annoying though. Glad they raised it.

      • kittyrunningnoise@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s amazing that you’ve been downvoted for saying you pay for a service you use that’s not ad-riddled junk. how else do people expect these entities to make money that pays for servers, employees, etc.? someone operates the hardware and it’s not free.

    • pokemaster787@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A basic photo from my phone is over the file size limit. It’s essentially unusable

      For a while this was a problem, but now Discord just auto-compresses photos over 8MB. Obviously this isn’t ideal if you want to actually share the full-size image, but for most use-cases a compressed photo is fine. Almost every other chat app is also compressing your images, it just isn’t telling you it’s doing it outright.

      • JshKlsn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        When did they start this? Because I last tried a few months ago to send a photo and it was telling me it was too large, and to buy nitro. It was ~8.6MB

        • pokemaster787@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Years ago, as far as I can tell. Are you using an older version of the app maybe? I’ve not had Discord outright refuse to send pictures for ~2 years now, for a while it would ask to compress them, now it’ll just automatically compress them (unless it’s so big it can’t of course).

          Back in April they also increased the limit to 25MB, so even less stuff should need to get compressed anyway.

          • TrixieOfTheTrade@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I believe it doesn’t always work for whatever reason. I had images from my phone get the ‘over 8mb’ message sometimes only a few months ago as well, sometimes it worked but other times it didn’t

    • ThEgg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Discord’s monetary scheme is so backwards. Pay to be able to upload a file greater than 8 MB… up to 100 MB. Pay to be able to upload and use animated emojis, pay to be able to use emojis from other channels. These are not features worth paying for.

      • Nelots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        A loooot of people seem to completely disagree considering how many people pay for nitro even after they removed discriminators (and the ability to change them with nitro).

  • eatyourglory@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This was because Skype’s file transfer was Peer-to-peer, so it wasn’t Skype itself hosting the files. While discord is actually hosting the files, which is much more costly.

      • ratamacue@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But discord supports sending messages to people who are offline. It kind of breaks the paradigm if certain features require full synchronous communication. Maybe supporting p2p transfers during a video / voice chat would work though.

        • Helluin@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It kind of breaks the paradigm if certain features require full synchronous communication.

          you mean like voice/video chat?

          • ratamacue@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually yeah. It feels like voice / videos were kind of tacked on. There isn’t a really good web based chat tool that doesn’t require some sign in and configuration. File transfer isn’t like that and people can easily drop links to third party services in any chat.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You say it as if not allowing people to send large files at all is somehow better than only allowing it sometimes.