Hmmm, looks like Biden needs to tell them to stop being mean again.
He’s too busy posting NFL memes trying to get votes for the election later this year
He’s gonna sprain his finger wagging it so hard.
Jesus fucking Christ.
The next Hamas propaganda piece.
All those stupid Human Rights Watch organizations out there spreading Khamass propaganda smh
Here’s their wikipedia page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro-Mediterranean_Human_Rights_Monitor
Founder and chairman is Ramy Abdu:
Ramy Abdu (Arabic: رامي عبده) (or Ramy Abdo) is a Palestinian financial expert, assistant professor of Law and Finance, and human rights advocate who was born in the Gaza Strip. He is the founder and chairman of the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor … Abdu was the assistant director and Palestine Office Manager for Council for European Palestinian Relations, an organisation described by The Independent as "a Belgian non-profit organisation that lobbies on behalf of the Hamas-led Gaza Government
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramy_Abdu
Not that this means the story isn’t true obviously, but the source isn’t exactly unbiased.
Suddenly when you can’t link MBFC because it doesn’t work this time you start linking Wikipedia shit.
Zionists and trying to question the source on every single anti-israel post name a better combo
I don’t care what an IDF soldier editing wikipedia wrote using quotes from a Zionist newspaper. This is an official EU registered non-profit.
Is the Independent a Zionist newspaper?
described by The Independent as "a Belgian non-profit organisation that lobbies on behalf of the Hamas-led Gaza Government
Yes
Is this the kind of headline you would read in a Zionist newspaper?
Maybe you can go onto Wikipedia and edit the quote out if you’re claiming The Independent didn’t say it.
You can find Times Of Israel writing a “positive” article about Palestinians once a while too. Doesn’t undo them repeating debunked IDF lies in multiple articles even after it has been debunked.
Again I don’t understand at all how they actually rank anything kn the mbfc.
Say almost nothing then bam, mixed for questionable sources but never mentioned that until saying mixed.
And used extremely biased sources for why it is bad
Also, depending on who you ask, “lobbying on behalf of the Hamas-controlled government” can mean basically any support for Palestinians, including any criticism of the Israeli government’s atrocities.
We should trust our news to come from reliable sources like the Israeli military, which has given us great pieces like the 40 beheaded babies, raped women and hospital terrorist command centres. Their information is always backed by great evidence that they just can’t show you.
I do not support the brutal actions of the IDF. But this particular story smells funny to me.
What possible motive would the Israelis have to seed evidence of their own crimes?
Videos of this held by civilians are at high risk of being leaked or hacked off phones by a technically competent opponent like Iran. That could only possibly add pressure to the US to rein in their wayward ally.
Maybe my instinct is off, that’s totally possible, but this seems like all risk and no reward. I’m waiting for more proof or corroboration before I accept this.
Ha ha ha, haven’t been watching the non-j-post news lately?
There have been loads of videos of atrocities uploaded to the internet where IDF soldiers gleefully record themselves. They are supremacists, and they do not see anything wrong with their actions. Supremacy is baked into Zionism. They literally think they’re cleansing the land of vermin.
Sounds like you haven’t been paying attention to this genodide.
In decemeber they marched groups of Palestinians around in their underwear to parade them off
They share videos of them openly destroying Palestinian peoples property
They beat and torture prisoners and civilains
They are very open about showing this to the world.
Public humiliation, yes. Dehumanization efforts, yes. Publicly deniable torture of prisoners, seems very likely. Official distribution of graphic violence, we’ve seen that.
But creating wide spread video evidence of tortured prosoners and leaving it amongst random civilians where they have no control over it? That just doesn’t seem like the same thing.
Maybe the videos will surface and I’ll be proved wrong.
What control do you think they had over a telegram channel anyone could join?
They controlled the channel didn’t they? It was the IDF publishing their killings. If there was something especially incriminating they could just not publish it.
It’s just another step on the ladder. They’re testing how far they can go with the genocide without anybody relevant complaining.
You don’t think the IDF which dresses up in dinosaur costumes to fire mortal shells into Gaza would do this?
They believe they are fully invincible from any reprecussions from the West. And so far they have been proven right.
The Era Of War Crime Influencers is a good video on this.
Mortal shells?
Rockets leave a big trail of fire behind them. They are usually more precise.
Mortars are like long range grenade-bullets. hence the big “gun” shooting them.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
The IDF is committing war-crimes on Tik-Tok as if it’s a funny joke.
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Funny thing about war reporting, you cant really trust any news from any side. Unless you are there you wont really know, treat all news as propaganda.
Ps fucking love all the downvotes that dont do shit :)
Unless you are there you wont really know
I disagree, I think that journalists can get accurate reporting out of war zones. With some critical reasoning and wide reading an accurate enough - if not complete - picture is possible.
Well when i was deployed my parents read and heared (tv, paper) things and eventually asked me about it and i was like, what?? Most of it was bull. Some where sort of correct but moslty it was horseshit or twisted.
moslty it was horseshit
Yeah, that seems about right. I agree that treating all news as propaganda is good advice, and there’s a certain resolution of detail that we’ll probably not be able to get right for a while if ever.
But I think it’s dangerous to dismiss the possiblity of getting to the truth at all.
That is all, just be wary and read everything with caution. Dont need to dismiss everything but just be wary.
That’s why Israel has been actively targeting journalists in the war zone.
Before someone comes in to say “Israel has been letting western news reporters in”, let’s clarify something.
They have been actively targeting journalists reporting the Palestinian perspective.
Western news reporters from places like CNN or BBC are provided access to the war zone through Israel, and Israel reserves the right to screen what they report on. It is heavily whitewashed.
Funny thing about war reporting, it’s done by international news agencies and covered by multiple sides along with graphic video evidence - so you can trust a lot that is mass verified.
Yeah you are right. Its probably all true.
Post was removed under Rule 3:
“Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.”
I was asked to please review it.
Everything I can tell about euromedmonitor.org indicates the removal of the post is valid.
https://www.ngo-monitor.org/ngos/euro-med-human-rights-monitor/
https://www.ngo-monitor.org/ngos/euro_mediterranean_human_rights_network_emhrn_/
I’m restoring the post long enough to make this reply and removing it again.
I’d caution users on both sides of the conflict: If a story you want to submit seems UNUSUALLY inflammatory, wait until there’s a better source. We’ve been over this time and time again. The first casualty of war is the truth.
How normalized does hatred have to be for anyone to think that this defense isn’t inherently despicable:
…falsity of the Israeli army’s claim that the Palestinian civilians subjected to torture in the presence of Israeli civilians were fighters involved in the October 7 attack
Hamas prisoners or not this is pure, unfettered zealotry and it’s embarrassing that these soldiers thought this would be a credible justification.
Edit: welp I did some digging and I don’t know what to believe now:
https://unwatch.org/un-human-rights-office-amplifies-blood-libel-by-terrorist-sympathizers/
Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor’s leadership routinely posts antisemitic and pro-Hamas content online.
The chairman of Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor’s Board is none other than Richard Falk—the former UN Special Rapporteur on Palestine who has hailed Hamas’ “spirit of resistance,” justified Palestinian violence, and claimed that Hamas aims for “long-term peaceful co-existence.” While he was Special Rapporteur, Falk was at the center of multiple controversies that led to continuous calls for his resignation by the U.S., UK, Canada, Australia, and others. According to the U.S. State Department, this was because of his “despicable and deeply offensive comments, particularly his anti-Semitic blog postings, his endorsement of 9/11 conspiracy theories, and his deplorable statements with regard to the terrorist attacks in Boston.” Falk had first called the Boston bombing a false flag and then justified it as a form of “resistance” that was “bound” to result from U.S. “military undertakings.” Even Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon had to come out several times to publicly denounce Falk’s statements. Falk’s antisemitism has even gotten him fired from a Human Rights Watch committee.
UNWatch is a literal Zionist psyop calling UNRWA Hamas…
The fact that you’re quoting them to “debunk” anything proves that Euro-Med-Monitor is legit. Just go to their front page and scroll to the bottom https://unwatch.org/
UN Watch stands at the forefront in combating racism, antisemitism, and anti-Israel prejudice at the UN, taking the offensive against dictatorships and double standards.
Jesus Fucking Christ mbfc. Not a great look saying there credible https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/un-watch/
Yo wtf that’s actually insane. That’s basically full proof that MBFC is ran by a Zionist
Sure, I definitely see that they’re biased towards Pro-Israeli and their founder was Chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. I’m not going to stop looking until I find something conclusive, because of how repulsive these reported actions are. There’s a lot of propaganda out there, though.
How “conclusive” do you want to get?
Some more UNWatch propaganda screenshots:
Executive Director of UNRWA “Hill Neuer” spreading propaganda and highlighting it on his site:
Editing pictures of Hamas in front of an UNRWA building:
This speaks to the inescapable brutality at the heart of all humans.
Using a torture camp as an attraction park for civilians is some shit I thought I would only read in fiction books like Hunger Games.
Perhaps the Israelis can buy VIP passes like Disneyland.
As far as I am aware, while regular civilians in Germany aided the Nazis in rounding up Jews, they didn’t typically participate in the concentration camps.
This is quite different indeed.
Speak for yourself. Some people find violence and torture repugnant.
Me too. But the reason we do is only circumstantial. Any and all humans are capable of such actions under the right circumstances.
My point is the irony of a culture who bases their entire national identity on previous victimhood and centuries of oppression is now frolicking in the blood and screams of others.
Very, very human, and awful.
Yeah well when you hold fast to a religion that encourages mindless obedience, murder and violence, you reap what you sow. Or any other deadly fantasy.
So… pretty much any religion?
Buddhism wants to have a word with you.
Myanmar say hello
Contemporary example: Buddhist Inspired Genocide
And you can also check Wikipedia:
Buddhist scripture condemns violence in every form. Ahimsa, a term meaning “not to injure”, is a primary virtue in Buddhism. However, Buddhists have historically used scriptures to justify violence or form exceptions to commit violence for various reasons.
There may be individuals whose personal interpretation of Buddhism leads them to avoid violence, but organized religion as a whole is a social system where a hierarchy struggles to maintain ideological control over their followers on the basis of faith, which is a magnificent tool for anyone who wants to get others to justify heinous crimes against their out-group, and is routinely used that way in all major religions.
Thank you for the additional info.
I think I just wanted to believe there’s at least one religion that leads to good deeds and good deeds only. You may call me naive.
Buddhism is no better, as practiced. I can give you the long version if you want.
I’d love to get the long version, because from what I’ve gathered so far Buddhism doesn’t appear to be built around aggregation and (ab)use of power.
I may be completely off though and would like to have additional information!
deleted by creator
Perhaps not every religion, but every religion that has passed the historical test of getting and maintaining millions of followers through history.
