• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The top tax bracket used to be 92%…

      Like, after a certain point for ever $100 you were paid, the government took $92 and left you with $8 and your other deductions.

      It’s honestly that easy to change, just bring back the same tax brackets we had under Eisenhower and we’d pretty much fix the income gap immediately. Or at least we’d have plenty of tax revenue to fix shit and provide safety nets.

      It’s insane like we act like we can’t figure out a solution, when we already had one 60 years ago…

      • Spiracle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sadly, not that easy, since “income” no longer accounts for the huge wealth gap. Until stocks and assets are counted and taxed appropriately, the top 0.1% will remain just as wealthy.

        It might work on parts of the 1% to 0.1%, though.

    • Tricky_Nerd@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This IS our society.

      The entire thing needs to be burned to the ground and started fresh. We need to close the stock market as well, it only harms literally everyone that isn’t in the Investor class of humans. Figure out Capital a different way if need be, but the way we’re doing it is literally killing all of us, and the vast majority of species on the planet currently.

      • QHC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t agree that “burn it all down” is the right solution, especially if we’re hypothetically in agreement that the end goal is the maximization of happiness for the highest number of people. Going through that transition will be worse than what we have now for most, and there’s no guarantee that a more equitable society is built in the ashes of this one.

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has always been this way for thousands of years. Democracy changed the rules a bit, but it’s always been a battle between the meek and poor vs rich and powerful.

  • donut4ever@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, isn’t that why layoffs actually happen? To save a bit of extra millions for those poor poor and broke CEOs?

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you know how much it costs to fly private these days? It’s unconscionable. Imagine their pain.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How does that meme go? Pain relief: tiny brain, aspirin. Regular brain, Tylenol. Giant brain, oxycodone. Galaxy brain, $1 million bonus.

  • thisbenzingring@wirebase.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    1 year ago

    Disgusting. These executives shouldn’t be able to collect any bonus once they have a bankruptcy filing. This is about as ugly as capitalism gets.

    • dub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      But who else will make a PowerPoint about how much work they don’t do?

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, won’t somebody please think of the poor execs? Can you imagine only being able to afford one yacht? That’s practically living in poverty!

    • galloog1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a real issue of good leadership not being willing to join sinking ships. How do you motivate people to join that have the best chance of turning things around without some type of compensation? Why would they join?

      This is essentially the situations that creates this. In a non capitalist system there is nothing that can be done and you either force someone to do it or you attract worse leadership and things snowball.

      • kklusz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for explaining, I hadn’t thought of that.

        But why don’t lower level workers get similar perks in return for joining a sinking ship? And clearly, the leadership failed to turn the ship around in this case, so how do we know they were even good to begin with?

  • PortableHotpocket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Business as usual. All the execs get golden parachutes and will probably have another high paying job lined up right after. Welcome to the machine.

    • Techmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh I see you ran this company into the ground. Made terrible decisions, laid off most of the staff, collected a 5 million dollar bonus, then filed bankruptcy. You want to come run our company? We’ll pay you 8 million a year and give you 15 million if/when you destroy our company just like you did to the last one!

  • fearout@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why do they always do it within a few days after layoffs? Like guys, wait for a few months at least

    • Boondock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most these guys get paid in stock options.

      They likely request it to be timed this way to get more shares of the company off the back of the bad news dump.

      It’s like insider trading but on the buy side soo not as likely to be investigated.