NASA’s Voyager 2 has lost communication with Earth due to an unintentional shift in its antenna direction. The next programmed orientation adjustment on October 15 is expected to restore communication, while Voyager 1 continues to operate as usual.

A series of scheduled commands directed at NASA’s Voyager 2 spacecraft on July 21 led to an unintentional change in antenna direction. Consequently, the antenna moved 2 degrees off course from Earth, causing the spacecraft to lose its ability to receive commands or transmit data back to our planet.

  • Yepthatsme@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    What a great project. Really puts perspective on what can be accomplished with public funds and vision. Meanwhile shit like Starlink exists and lasts maybe a couple of years. I wonder whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy???

    • Thadrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      11 months ago

      As much as I’d like to agree, those projects have very different goals and constraints.

    • astral_avocado@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because they’re low orbit communication satellites that require a lot of fuel to maintain said orbit, and are designed to deorbit pretty quickly so as to not pollute LEO with junk?

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      As much as I hate Musk and most of his idiot projects, Starlink isn’t that bad of an idea. Traditional SATCOM internet is more expensive for shittier service. From what I’ve read, Starlink has been fairly reliable, not overly expensive, and performance is pretty solid. Sure, in areas that already have “excellent” terrestrial internet providers available, it is pretty useless. But for rural areas, it’s a godsend.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          But private companies can do things public companies can’t do!1

          1. Because private companies don’t have the GOP actively sabotaging them whenever they are in power so that they can argue that private companies work better than public ones.2

          2. Unless your private company supports groups that the GOP hates.

          • artifice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Please don’t help infect this place with partisan politics. This is my safe haven.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      It isn’t apple to apples. I saw a doc once on it where they interviewed the engineers involved and one was honest how he didn’t really follow orders and padded it. If there were two options for a given component he picked the one that would last longer not the cheaper one. While other systems are designed to use as little material and cheap material as possible because they are intended to die after a few months and be mass produced.

      Additionally it didn’t have vision. The original plan was to do the whole solar system. NASA was concerned about overpromising and budget issues so they told their staff to set the goal of up to Saturn only.

      I personally think there is plenty of room for both commercial and public. Ideally I would like to see public take on this very scientific no practical application stuff and projects that are too risky while commercial brings down the cost.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Commercial brings down the cost

        That is just another way of saying imposes negative externalities.

        I am wary of commercial anything, I don’t really trust any company. We are still having major pollution events, some being planned to this day. And even some of the smallest, most seemingly benevolent startups sometimes turnout out to be so evil they are literally scamming people out of life.

        Maybe once we have real jail time for executives and the corporate death penalty by destruction of charter and a little bit of a time period without an event of awful corporate negligence, maybe then space commercialization might be a net benefit.

  • Astrealix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wonder if we could ping it off one of the other satellites we have around other planets to get a message out to it. Fingers crossed it’s back in contact by October and we don’t have to try weird shit though

    • helpimnotdrowning@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      I would imagine 2° at 12 billion miles means it’s almost certainly not pointing at anything man-made anymore, but I’m also not an astrophysicist so ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

      Being that far out I don’t even think we could go out and fix it anymore

      • Astrealix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh absolutely not. I’m just wondering if we could get stupidly lucky XD maybe it happens to be pointing at Voyager 1 (honestly idk how the trigonometry works out but maybe New Horizons?? Lol)

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          We’re talking about the most proverbially gone shit in human history. Not only is it too far away, it is going faster than any man-made object has ever gone.

          …And we once launched a massive metal disc out of a giant bore hole with a nuclear explosion.

          Edit: actually Operation Plumbbob sent the steel bore cap nearly 4x as fast as Voyager. Suck it, nerds.

        • TheAndrewBrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          A shift of 2° at 12.3 billion miles means it’s now pointing about 430 million miles away from the earth. The likelihood that it would be pointing at one of the small handful of man made objects that are out that far is infinitesimally small. Imagine being in a filed 100 miles wide and spinning a bottle with a laser pointer on it and hoping it lands pointing at a single bottle cap at the edge of the field. That would be magnitudes more likely than this pointing at one of our objects. And even if it did, those also would have antennas pointed at Earth so they couldn’t receive the message without turning which might cause the same issue for them.

        • Thadrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’d guess even if some other man made satellite is perfectly in line, those wouldn’t have even close to the necessary transmission power to reach voyager.

      • Johnny5@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        And even if it was pointed at random human equipment it’s so far away that you need a very special radio and antenna; not just any old satellite is necessarily going to do the trick. I think the signal strength is around -196db iirc so incredibly faint, and The antennas they use to communicate with voyager are massive.

          • Gork@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I could see some far-future humans intercepting the Voyagers, catching them, and putting them in a museum somewhere.

    • MrTulip@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      If I read it correctly, the probe checks periodically, and if it loses contact, it uses the location of known stars to point its antenna back towards the Earth. If that doesn’t work, it’s gone.

  • Parabola@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    As a software engineer I feel for the person who accidentally sent the wrong value and caused an icon to be offline, potentially forever.

    • Betty White In HD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      But also the whole thing is a science project and it has gone incredibly well so far.

      I understand striving for perfection and everything but NASA is just about hurling things into outer space to collect data in a calculate manner. There have been worse mistakes that killed people in varying degrees of bad ways.

    • EnderWi99in@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not going to be offline forever. It’ll reorient in a couple months. It was designed to do this when comms are lost. Still a little scary though.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        This assumes their understanding of what caused the problem is accurate.

        Should it be ever so slightly imprecise, it could mean we lose contact forever.

        • zalack@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          This is one of those things that sounds meaningful, but can be said about literally any problem in any system. Not all knowledge requires the same level of precision for confidence.

          If the engineers at NASA who are familiar with the system say this is a known error state that will be fixed the next time the system designed to correct it fires on its set schedule, there’s not a whole lot added by saying sure, but what if they’re wrong?

          It’s just restating the table stakes of existence.

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, the level of precision that is required for this is quite literally unprecedented. You can try and dig at my post all you want, but it just seems like you have an axe to grind.

            • zalack@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Precision for what? Knowing their cron job will fire? Knowing what was wrong with the commands they sent? Neither of those are crazy precise or ambiguous statements?

              The only highly precise thing that needs to happen is the alignment of the antenna but that system has been working for decades already and has been thoroughly tested.

              NASA tends to be pretty straightforward when talking about risks, and if they feel like all the systems are in working order and there’s a good chance we’ll be back in contact with it, I think it’s worth talking them at their word.

              Like yeah, it’s impressive they can aim an antenna that precisely, but using stars to orient an object is a very very well understood geometry problem. NASA has been using that technique at least as far back as Apollo

                • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I think if there’s anyone that knows anything about telemetry, it’s NASA. These machines have been engineered for these scenarios for decades by some of the most unfathomably brilliant minds that have straight dedicate their lives to this. The science of this has been confirmed by similarly brilliant minds the world over.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            11 months ago

            But what if I, armchair scientist on Lemmy, sees a flaw in the plan of some of the greatest engineers in the world? Doesn’t the world deserve to know what I think about the communications system I just became aware of today?

            • zalack@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Lol. The knee-jerk contrarianism online really gets under my skin, especially when it’s towards experts.

              Like yeah, sometimes experts are wrong or systems don’t behave as expected. But framing that as some sort of erudite insight really bugs me.

              “I hope the recovery system works!” doesn’t need to be rewritten as “Mmm yes. But what these engineers haven’t considered is the possibility that they are wrong”.

              • glimse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                I had a laugh at this line:

                It’s just restating the table stakes of existence.

                Brilliantly put. It’s like saying to a stranger on an airplane, “If these pilots don’t know how to fly, we are gonna die!”

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’re right, internet stranger. I bet they have not considered the possibility that Voyager 2 might have been eaten by a space whale. Like why aren’t the lame-stream fake news channels even discussing the space whale theory. Voyager 2 might even be intact inside the belly of the beast, and if NASA engineers haven’t factored this new data into their calculations about how fast a space whale would float through space with the additional mass and inertia of a functional probe, the signal could be lost forever.

          I challenge Neil Degrass Tyson to a debate about space whales and how much they would theoretically be able to swallow whole.

  • RFBurns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Communication wasn’t “lost”, it was thrown away through malpractice.

  • EnderWi99in@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’ll reconnect and align back the next time it pings back to Earth. It was designed for this kind of contingency. It’s very unlikely its lost forever.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    There’s actually a group of alien teenagers following it and occasionally giving it a spin or nudge, just to fuck with us. They think its hilarious.